2024 Acura MDX vs 2023 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid

2023 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
2023 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
$50,795MSRP
Overview
Overview
OverviewShop Now
2024 Acura MDX
2024 Acura MDX
$50,150MSRP
Overview
Overview
OverviewShop Now
2023 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
$50,795MSRP
Overview
Overview
OverviewShop Now
2024 Acura MDX
$50,150MSRP
Overview
Overview
OverviewShop Now
Overview

MSRP

$50,795

MSRP

$50,150

Average price

$53,421

Average price

$70,674

Listings

16

Listings

83
Ratings & Reviews
User Reviews
User Reviews

Expert reviews

7.0 out of 10

Expert reviews

7.8 out of 10
Pros
  • Fuel-efficient
  • Great safety ratings
  • Easy-to-use technology
Cons
  • Poor value for money
Pros
  • Strong engines
  • Sharp handling
  • Lots of standard features
Cons
  • Frustrating infotainment system
  • Ride can be firm for some
  • Small third row

2023 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid Reviews Summary

Minivans have gotten a bad rap. Many folks think of them as boring, nondescript family vehicles that signal the end of one’s carefree youth. In truth, they are often a better choice than a hulking SUV for moving gear and people. Case in point is the 2023 Chrysler Pacifica, particularly the plug-in hybrid version. This minivan is extra efficient and has plenty of tech and comforts. However, our tester compromises a bit on some key features and is priced way above its competitors.

2024 Acura MDX Reviews Summary

The Acura MDX is a mainstay of the luxury SUV segment, and it covers the bases remarkably well. Its well-rounded nature is perhaps because it shares a platform with the Honda Pilot (another fantastic family hauler) but for that same reason, it doesn’t offer the same cachet as a BMW X5 or Mercedes-Benz GLE. Whether you are on a road trip or heading to work, the MDX is comfortable, refined, and has space for the family and their gear. For 2024, there’s a new Type S Ultra trim level, bringing a new level of performance to the three-row, seven-passenger midsize luxury SUV. But as we’ll get into in a bit, the MDX is held back by a maddening infotainment system that could truly be a sticking point to overshadow all other positive attributes.

Verdict: The MDX is a beautiful, safe, and cost-effective luxury SUV, and the new Type S Ultra trim level delivers a higher level of performance. However, it doesn’t offer as much space as some of its competitors, and we wouldn’t recommend it to anyone easily frustrated by finnicky tech interfaces.

No video found
Popular Features & Specs

Engine

3.6L 260 hp V6 Hybrid

Engine

3.5L 290 hp V6

Drive Train

FWD

Drive Train

FWD

Seating Capacity

7

Seating Capacity

7

Horsepower

Horsepower

290 hp @ 6200 rpm

EV Battery Capacity

16 kWh

EV Battery Capacity

MPG City

29

MPG City

19

MPG Highway

30

MPG Highway

26

Battery Charge Time (120V)

14 hours

Battery Charge Time (120V)

Battery Charge Time (240V)

2 hours

Battery Charge Time (240V)

2023 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
2023 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
$50,795MSRP
Overview
Overview
OverviewShop Now
2024 Acura MDX
2024 Acura MDX
$50,150MSRP
Overview
Overview
OverviewShop Now
2023 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
$50,795MSRP
Overview
Overview
OverviewShop Now
2024 Acura MDX
$50,150MSRP
Overview
Overview
OverviewShop Now
Overview
MSRP
$50,795
$50,150
Average price
$53,421
$70,674
Listings
Ratings & Reviews
User reviews
4.6
4.8
Expert reviews

7.0 out of 10

Read full review

7.8 out of 10

Read full review
Pros & cons
Pros
  • Fuel-efficient
  • Great safety ratings
  • Easy-to-use technology
Cons
  • Poor value for money
Pros
  • Strong engines
  • Sharp handling
  • Lots of standard features
Cons
  • Frustrating infotainment system
  • Ride can be firm for some
  • Small third row
Summary
Minivans have gotten a bad rap. Many folks think of them as boring, nondescript family vehicles that signal the end of one’s carefree youth. In truth, they are often a better choice than a hulking SUV for moving gear and people. Case in point is the 2023 Chrysler Pacifica, particularly the plug-in hybrid version. This minivan is extra efficient and has plenty of tech and comforts. However, our tester compromises a bit on some key features and is priced way above its competitors.

The Acura MDX is a mainstay of the luxury SUV segment, and it covers the bases remarkably well. Its well-rounded nature is perhaps because it shares a platform with the Honda Pilot (another fantastic family hauler) but for that same reason, it doesn’t offer the same cachet as a BMW X5 or Mercedes-Benz GLE. Whether you are on a road trip or heading to work, the MDX is comfortable, refined, and has space for the family and their gear. For 2024, there’s a new Type S Ultra trim level, bringing a new level of performance to the three-row, seven-passenger midsize luxury SUV. But as we’ll get into in a bit, the MDX is held back by a maddening infotainment system that could truly be a sticking point to overshadow all other positive attributes.

Verdict: The MDX is a beautiful, safe, and cost-effective luxury SUV, and the new Type S Ultra trim level delivers a higher level of performance. However, it doesn’t offer as much space as some of its competitors, and we wouldn’t recommend it to anyone easily frustrated by finnicky tech interfaces.

Video
No video found
Popular Features & Specs
Engine
3.6L 260 hp V6 Hybrid
3.5L 290 hp V6
Drive Train
FWD
FWD
Seating Capacity
7
7
Horsepower
290 hp @ 6200 rpm
EV Battery Capacity
16 kWh
MPG City
29
19
MPG Highway
30
26
Battery Charge Time (120V)
14 hours
Battery Charge Time (240V)
2 hours
CarGurus logo

By: CarGurus + AI

At CarGurus, our team of experienced automotive writers remain at the heart of our content operation, conducting hands-on car tests and writing insightful guides that are backed by years of industry experience. To complement this, we are harnessing AI to make our content offering more diverse and more helpful to shoppers than ever. To achieve this, our AI systems are based exclusively on CarGurus content, ratings and data, so that what we produce is both unique to CarGurus, and uniquely helpful to car shoppers.

Popular vehicle comparisons

Similar Comparisons

Similar Comparisons by Year