Land Rover Range Rover Evoque HSE Dynamic Convertible vs Ford Fusion Titanium
Ford Fusion Titanium $34,340MSRP | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque HSE Dynamic Convertible $57,700MSRP |
Ford Fusion Titanium $34,340MSRP | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque HSE Dynamic Convertible $57,700MSRP |
---|
Overview | |
Years produced2013-2019 | Years produced2017 |
MSRP$34,340 | MSRP$57,700 |
Listings400 | Listings475 |
Ratings & Reviews | |
User Reviews | User Reviews |
Popular Features & Specs | |
Engine2.0L 245 hp I4 | Engine2.0L 240 hp I4 |
Drive TrainFWD | Drive TrainAWD |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity4 |
Horsepower | Horsepower240 hp @ 5800 rpm |
MPG City21 | MPG City20 |
MPG Highway31 | MPG Highway28 |
Engine | |
Engine Name2.0L 240 hp I4 | Engine Name2.0L 240 hp I4 |
Torque270 lb-ft @ 1750 rpm | Torque250 lb-ft @ 1750 rpm |
Horsepower240 hp @ 5500 rpm | Horsepower240 hp @ 5800 rpm |
DrivetrainFWD | DrivetrainAWD |
Fuel Economy | |
MPG City22 | MPG City20 |
MPG Highway33 | MPG Highway28 |
Interior | |
Leather SeatsStandard | Leather SeatsStandard |
Seating Capacity5 | Seating Capacity4 |
Key Features | |
Navigation System | Navigation SystemStandard |
Safety | |
Front Crash Overall5 | Front Crash Overall |
Side Crash Overall4 | Side Crash Overall |
Dimensions & Capacity | |
Cargo Space16.0 cu ft | Cargo Space8.9 cu ft |
Curb Weight3427 lbs | Curb Weight4268 lbs |
Height58.1 in | Height63.3 in |
Length191.7 in | Length172.0 in |
Width83.5 in | Width82.1 in |
Wheelbase112.2 in | Wheelbase104.8 in |
Maximum Payload | Maximum Payload1042 lbs |
Number of doors4 | Number of doors2 |
Maximum Towing Capacity | Maximum Towing Capacity3307 lbs |
Ford Fusion Titanium $34,340MSRP | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque HSE Dynamic Convertible $57,700MSRP |
Ford Fusion Titanium $34,340MSRP | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque HSE Dynamic Convertible $57,700MSRP |
---|
Overview | ||
Years produced | 2013-2019 | 2017 |
MSRP | $34,340 | $57,700 |
Listings | ||
Ratings & Reviews | ||
User reviews | ||
Popular Features & Specs | ||
Engine | 2.0L 245 hp I4 | 2.0L 240 hp I4 |
Drive Train | FWD | AWD |
Seating Capacity | 5 | 4 |
Horsepower | 240 hp @ 5800 rpm | |
MPG City | 21 | 20 |
MPG Highway | 31 | 28 |
Engine | ||
Engine Name | 2.0L 240 hp I4 | 2.0L 240 hp I4 |
Torque | 270 lb-ft @ 1750 rpm | 250 lb-ft @ 1750 rpm |
Horsepower | 240 hp @ 5500 rpm | 240 hp @ 5800 rpm |
Drivetrain | FWD | AWD |
Fuel Economy | ||
MPG City | 22 | 20 |
MPG Highway | 33 | 28 |
Interior | ||
Leather Seats | Standard | Standard |
Seating Capacity | 5 | 4 |
Key Features | ||
Navigation System | Standard | |
Safety | ||
Front Crash Overall | 5 | |
Side Crash Overall | 4 | |
Dimensions & Capacity | ||
Cargo Space | 16.0 cu ft | 8.9 cu ft |
Curb Weight | 3427 lbs | 4268 lbs |
Height | 58.1 in | 63.3 in |
Length | 191.7 in | 172.0 in |
Width | 83.5 in | 82.1 in |
Wheelbase | 112.2 in | 104.8 in |
Maximum Payload | 1042 lbs | |
Number of doors | 4 | 2 |
Maximum Towing Capacity | 3307 lbs | |
By: CarGurus + AI
At CarGurus, our team of experienced automotive writers remain at the heart of our content operation, conducting hands-on car tests and writing insightful guides that are backed by years of industry experience. To complement this, we are harnessing AI to make our content offering more diverse and more helpful to shoppers than ever. To achieve this, our AI systems are based exclusively on CarGurus content, ratings and data, so that what we produce is both unique to CarGurus, and uniquely helpful to car shoppers.
Popular vehicle comparisons
Range Rover Evoque HSE Dynamic Convertible vs Challenger R/T Scat Pack Widebody RWDFusion Titanium vs Charger Daytona RWDC-Class AMG C 63 S Coupe vs Range Rover Evoque HSE Dynamic ConvertibleS-Class Coupe S 63 AMG 4MATIC vs Range Rover Evoque HSE Dynamic ConvertibleFusion Titanium vs Maxima Platinum FWDFusion Titanium vs C-Class C 300 CabrioletRange Rover Evoque HSE Dynamic Convertible vs E-Class E 450 Coupe RWD4 Series 440i Gran Coupe RWD vs Range Rover Evoque HSE Dynamic ConvertibleFusion Titanium vs Taurus Police Interceptor AWDFusion Titanium vs Focus ST